reviewing
This commit is contained in:
@@ -14,3 +14,8 @@
|
||||
- **Decision**: Validate docs manually against repo conventions and the specification’s success criteria (discoverability ≤2 steps, full module/host coverage, secrets map completeness).
|
||||
- **Rationale**: No automated tests for markdown; checklist-based review matches spec.
|
||||
- **Alternatives considered**: (a) Add automated linting now (rejected: out-of-scope for this documentation feature); (b) No validation (rejected: risks drift and omissions).
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision 4: Navigation and conflict logging
|
||||
- **Decision**: Anchor discoverability through `docs/constitution.md` with links to `docs/reference/index.md` and `docs/playbooks/`; record any conflict resolutions in `specs/001-ai-docs/research.md` with date and source references.
|
||||
- **Rationale**: Keeps navigation within two steps for AI and centralizes historical decisions for reconciliation.
|
||||
- **Alternatives considered**: (a) Distribute links per playbook only (rejected: harder to enforce two-step navigation); (b) Log conflicts in ad-hoc comments (rejected: loses traceability for AI tools).
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user