Initialize project structure with foundational files including .gitignore, README, and specification templates. Establish project constitution outlining core principles for code quality, testing, user experience, and performance. Add initial feature specification for Reference Board Viewer application.

This commit is contained in:
Danilo Reyes
2025-11-01 21:49:14 -06:00
parent 75492c3b61
commit 43bd1aebf0
15 changed files with 1718 additions and 436 deletions

View File

@@ -1,115 +1,181 @@
# Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME]
# Specification: [FEATURE_NAME]
**Feature Branch**: `[###-feature-name]`
**Created**: [DATE]
**Status**: Draft
**Input**: User description: "$ARGUMENTS"
**Version:** [X.Y.Z]
**Created:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Last Updated:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Status:** [Draft | Review | Approved | Implemented]
**Owner:** [OWNER_NAME]
## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
## Purpose
<!--
IMPORTANT: User stories should be PRIORITIZED as user journeys ordered by importance.
Each user story/journey must be INDEPENDENTLY TESTABLE - meaning if you implement just ONE of them,
you should still have a viable MVP (Minimum Viable Product) that delivers value.
Assign priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.) to each story, where P1 is the most critical.
Think of each story as a standalone slice of functionality that can be:
- Developed independently
- Tested independently
- Deployed independently
- Demonstrated to users independently
-->
Clear statement of what this specification defines and its business/technical value.
### User Story 1 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P1)
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently - e.g., "Can be fully tested by [specific action] and delivers [specific value]"]
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
2. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
---
### User Story 2 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P2)
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
---
### User Story 3 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P3)
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
---
[Add more user stories as needed, each with an assigned priority]
### Edge Cases
<!--
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
Fill them out with the right edge cases.
-->
- What happens when [boundary condition]?
- How does system handle [error scenario]?
## Requirements *(mandatory)*
<!--
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
Fill them out with the right functional requirements.
-->
## Requirements
### Functional Requirements
- **FR-001**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "allow users to create accounts"]
- **FR-002**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "validate email addresses"]
- **FR-003**: Users MUST be able to [key interaction, e.g., "reset their password"]
- **FR-004**: System MUST [data requirement, e.g., "persist user preferences"]
- **FR-005**: System MUST [behavior, e.g., "log all security events"]
#### FR1: [Requirement Name]
**Priority:** [Critical | High | Medium | Low]
**Description:** Detailed description of the requirement.
*Example of marking unclear requirements:*
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] Criterion 1 (testable condition)
- [ ] Criterion 2 (testable condition)
- [ ] Criterion 3 (testable condition)
- **FR-006**: System MUST authenticate users via [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: auth method not specified - email/password, SSO, OAuth?]
- **FR-007**: System MUST retain user data for [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: retention period not specified]
**Constitutional Alignment:**
- Testing: [How this will be tested per Principle 2]
- UX Impact: [User-facing implications per Principle 3]
- Performance: [Performance considerations per Principle 4]
### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
#### FR2: [Requirement Name]
[Repeat structure above]
- **[Entity 1]**: [What it represents, key attributes without implementation]
- **[Entity 2]**: [What it represents, relationships to other entities]
### Non-Functional Requirements
## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
#### NFR1: Performance
Per Constitutional Principle 4:
- Response time: [target, e.g., <200ms for p95]
- Throughput: [target, e.g., >1000 req/s]
- Resource limits: [memory/CPU bounds]
- Scalability: [expected load ranges]
<!--
ACTION REQUIRED: Define measurable success criteria.
These must be technology-agnostic and measurable.
-->
#### NFR2: Quality
Per Constitutional Principle 1:
- Code coverage: ≥80% (Principle 2 requirement)
- Linting: Zero errors/warnings
- Type safety: Full type hints on public APIs
- Documentation: All public APIs documented
### Measurable Outcomes
#### NFR3: User Experience
Per Constitutional Principle 3:
- Accessibility: WCAG 2.1 AA compliance
- Error handling: User-friendly messages
- Consistency: Follows existing design patterns
- Response feedback: <200ms or progress indicators
- **SC-001**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "Users can complete account creation in under 2 minutes"]
- **SC-002**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation"]
- **SC-003**: [User satisfaction metric, e.g., "90% of users successfully complete primary task on first attempt"]
- **SC-004**: [Business metric, e.g., "Reduce support tickets related to [X] by 50%"]
#### NFR4: Maintainability
Per Constitutional Principle 1:
- Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity <10 per function
- Dependencies: Explicit versioning, security audit
- Modularity: Clear separation of concerns
## Design
### Architecture Overview
[Diagram or description of system components and their interactions]
### Data Models
```python
# Example data structures with type hints
class ExampleModel:
"""Clear docstring explaining purpose."""
field1: str
field2: int
field3: Optional[List[str]]
```
### API/Interface Specifications
#### Endpoint/Method: [Name]
```python
def example_function(param1: str, param2: int) -> ResultType:
"""
Clear description of what this does.
Args:
param1: Description of parameter
param2: Description of parameter
Returns:
Description of return value
Raises:
ValueError: When validation fails
"""
pass
```
**Error Handling:**
- Error case 1: Response/behavior
- Error case 2: Response/behavior
### Testing Strategy
#### Unit Tests
- Component A: [Test scenarios]
- Component B: [Test scenarios]
- Edge cases: [List critical edge cases]
#### Integration Tests
- Integration point 1: [Test scenario]
- Integration point 2: [Test scenario]
#### Performance Tests
- Benchmark 1: [Target metric]
- Load test: [Expected traffic pattern]
## Implementation Considerations
### Performance Analysis
- Algorithmic complexity: [Big-O analysis]
- Database queries: [Query plans, indexes needed]
- Caching strategy: [What, when, invalidation]
- Bottleneck prevention: [Known risks and mitigations]
### Security Considerations
- Authentication/Authorization requirements
- Input validation requirements
- Data protection measures
### Migration Path
If this changes existing functionality:
- Backward compatibility strategy
- User migration steps
- Rollback plan
## Dependencies
### Internal Dependencies
- Module/Service A: [Why needed]
- Module/Service B: [Why needed]
### External Dependencies
```python
# New dependencies to add (with justification)
package-name==X.Y.Z # Why: specific reason for this dependency
```
## Rollout Plan
1. **Development:** [Timeline and milestones]
2. **Testing:** [QA approach and environments]
3. **Staging:** [Validation steps]
4. **Production:** [Deployment strategy - canary/blue-green/etc]
5. **Monitoring:** [Key metrics to watch]
## Success Metrics
Post-deployment validation:
- [ ] All acceptance criteria met
- [ ] Performance benchmarks achieved
- [ ] Zero critical bugs in first week
- [ ] User feedback collected and positive
- [ ] Test coverage ≥80% maintained
## Open Issues
- [ ] Issue 1 requiring resolution
- [ ] Issue 2 needing decision
## Appendix
### References
- Related specifications
- External documentation
- Research materials
### Change Log
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---------|------|--------|---------|
| 1.0.0 | YYYY-MM-DD | Name | Initial specification |